top of page
Search

Near-Surface Air Temperature Estimation in Turkey using Reanalysis Products and Machine Learning

Updated: Jan 2

Enhancing Near-Surface Air Temperature Accuracy in Turkey's Complex Terrain with reanalysis Data and Machine Learning

Accurate near-surface air temperature measurements are essential for understanding and managing Earth's climate and ecosystems. But what happens when traditional methods struggle to provide detailed information across diverse and challenging landscapes? Our recent study delves into this question, focusing on Turkey's complex terrain.

The Challenge of Accurate Temperature Mapping

Turkey’s varied geography creates diverse climate zones, from its towering eastern mountains to the coastal Mediterranean. While ground-based weather stations offer precise data, their sparse distribution leaves significant gaps. Satellite and reanalysis products like ERA5, AgERA5, and MERRA2 help fill these voids but often lack the spatial resolution needed for localized applications.

Our Solution: Downscaling with Machine Learning

In our study, we evaluated five reanalysis datasets — ERA5, ERA5-Land, AgERA5, MERRA2, and JRA-55 — using data from 1,120 weather stations across Turkey. The goal was to determine which dataset best represents near-surface air temperature in this diverse and complex region.

Spatial distribution of meteorological stations over Koppen-Geiger climate classification of Turkey.
Spatial distribution of meteorological stations over Koppen-Geiger climate classification of Turkey.

The Best Dataset for Turkey

AgERA5 emerged as the most reliable dataset for estimating near-surface air temperature. It demonstrated superior performance across all seasons and annual averages, achieving the lowest mean absolute error (MAE) of 1.26°C. This makes AgERA5 the go-to dataset for air temperature estimation in Turkey's challenging terrain.

The Role of Downscaling

While AgERA5 leads in accuracy, we sought to further enhance its spatial resolution through downscaling techniques. We compared traditional interpolation methods with the Random Forest machine learning algorithm.

Key Findings:

  1. AgERA5 Leads the Pack: AgERA5 consistently outperformed other datasets, particularly on an annual and seasonal basis.

  2. The Power of Random Forest: Among the downscaling methods, Random Forest proved far superior, reducing errors significantly compared to traditional interpolation techniques.

  3. Seasonal and Regional Insights: The methods performed best in flat regions and during warmer seasons. Mountainous areas and winter months posed greater challenges, highlighting the influence of topography and climate.

     MAE (C) recorded at stations for downscaled AgERA5 by Random Forest
     MAE (C) recorded at stations for downscaled AgERA5 by Random Forest

Why Random Forest?

Machine learning offers a unique advantage by capturing nonlinear relationships between predictors and their response variables. In this study, we incorporated factors like land surface temperature, vegetation indices, and topographic variables to enhance predictions. The result? A more accurate and reliable air temperature map for Turkey.

Applications and Future Directions

Improved temperature mapping has profound implications. From agriculture to urban planning and disaster management, accurate temperature data supports better decision-making. With AgERA5's robust baseline accuracy and advanced downscaling methods like Random Forest, we’re opening new doors for research and application. Looking ahead, integrating additional data sources and exploring other machine-learning models could refine our approach even further.

Curious about the future of climate science and its practical applications? Stay tuned as we continue to explore these exciting advancements!


Reference

Karaman, Ç. H., & Akyürek, Z. (2023). Evaluation of near-surface air temperature reanalysis datasets and downscaling with machine learning-based Random Forest method for the complex terrain of Turkey. Advances in Space Research. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2023.02.006

 
 
 

Comments


bottom of page